Carbon 14 dating innacuracies Naughty free webcam
But in 1988, radiocarbon dating concluded it was a medieval hoax.
New scientific evidence poses the first substantive challenge, reopening debate about the Shroud’s authenticity.
Recent robust statistical studies add weight to this theory.
Philip Ball, the former physical science editor for Nature when the carbon dating results were published, recently wrote: “It’s fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever.” If we wish to be scientific we must admit we do not know how old the cloth is.
Even the famous Atheist Richard Dawkins admits it is controversial.
Christopher Ramsey, the director of the Oxford Radiocarbon Laboratory, thinks more testing is needed. This is because there are significant scientific and non-religious reasons to doubt the validity of the tests.
Again, this is all published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
The carbon dating, once seemingly proving it was a medieval fake, is now widely thought of as suspect and meaningless.But if the newer thread is about half of what was tested – and some evidence suggests that – it is possible that the cloth is from the time of Christ.No one has a good idea how front and back images of a crucified man came to be on the cloth.However, the producer and director have both shown excellent knowledge of the subject matter, a willingness to treat the subject fairly and a sensitivity to its serious nature.I am hopeful that will be reflected in the end result.
The producer attended the Ohio Shroud Conference in August to do research for the program, which has been in production for the past three months.